Welcome to the Child Life and Child Development Research Lab (CLCD) Lab! The CLCD lab examines child development and issues related to children and families experiencing healthcare events. Undergraduate and graduate students work alongside Dr. Burns-Nader to gain research experience and opportunities for presenting at local, state, and national conferences and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Examples of research topics include the daily experiences and coping of parents of newly diagnosed cancer patients, how the appearance of toys influence children's play, and the benefits of tablet distraction provided by a child life specialist. The lab collaborates with researchers at different children's hospitals, universities across the Southeast, the University Medical Center Pediatric Department, and the Department of Human Development and Family Studies. To learn more about this lab, review the web page and/or email Dr. Burns-Nader below.
News for the CLCD Lab
External Collaborators
|
Current Research Projects
Examining the role of facility dogs in pediatric programs.
In this study, Dr. Burns-Nader and CLCD lab members are collaborating with CCLS from Huntsville Women and Children's Hospital to examine staff members' perceptions of the role of facility dogs in pediatric programs, including benefits and obstacles. |
Assessment in the Child Life Profession: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Investigation
In this study, Drs. Burns-Nader, Boles, and Daniels will be exploring child life specialists' approaches to assessment in order to conceptualize and create a model of assessment. |
The Relationship of Parental Anxiety and Hospitalized Children's Anxiety in Kenya
This study will examine the relationship between parents' satisfaction and coping with hospitalization and the hospitalized children's anxiety in Kenya. |
Recent Thesis Projects
Handling facility dogs with pediatric patients: An exploration from a child life perspective
Emily Goldstein In this case study, Emily explores the use of child life specialist as facility dog handlers and their perceived benefits and difficulties of serving as a handler. |
|